A new remarkable Early Cretaceous nelumbonaceous fossil bridges the gap between herbaceous aquatic and woody protealeans

Nov 07, 2023

Scientific Reports volume 13, Article number: 8978 (2023) Cite this article

1181 Accesses

27 Altmetric

Metrics details

Dating back to the late Early Cretaceous, the macrofossil record of the iconic lotus family (Nelumbonaceae) is one of the oldest of flowering plants and suggests that their unmistakable leaves and nutlets embedded in large pitted receptacular fruits evolved relatively little in the 100 million years since their first known appearance. Here we describe a new fossil from the late Barremian/Aptian Crato Formation flora (NE Brazil) with both vegetative and reproductive structures, Notocyamus hydrophobus gen. nov. et sp. nov., which is now the oldest and most complete fossil record of Nelumbonaceae. In addition, it displays a unique mosaic of ancestral and derived macro- and micromorphological traits that has never been documented before in this family. This new Brazilian fossil-species also provides a rare illustration of the potential morphological and anatomical transitions experienced by Nelumbonaceae prior to a long period of relative stasis. Its potential plesiomorphic and apomorphic features shared with Proteaceae and Platanaceae not only fill a major morphological gap within Proteales but also provide new support for their unexpected relationships first suggested by molecular phylogenies.

The origin and early radiation of flowering plants are still unclear and remain one of the most enigmatic themes concerning the evolutionary history of vascular plants as a whole1. Although the fossil record may help to reduce morphological gaps between living taxa, it is inherently incomplete and may thus miss important evolutionary transitions. Such gaps in evidence for documenting plant evolution can be interpreted either as a consequence of a period with higher evolutionary rates over a short timescale or lower rates of evolution and relative stasis over a long timescale2. However, the scarcity of earliest and succeeding forms in fossil records can be also caused by preservational biases, undersampling and low intensity of investigation. Numerous studies of middle paleolatitude floras have significantly reduced the knowledge gaps on Early Cretaceous angiosperms, while those from paleotropical areas, where allegedly flowering plants started to diversify, are still in need of more investigations, especially regarding macrofossils of eudicots, the most diverse angiosperm clade3,4. The knowledge gaps on macrofossils in the Early Cretaceous tropics contrast with the substantial and comparatively well-studied microfossil record5,6.

The first reports of eudicots date back to the middle Early Cretaceous from circumtethyan areas, i.e., northern Gondwanan and southern Laurasian regions, and suggest that their origin and center of diversification were in northern Gondwana5,7. These reports are mainly based on their distinctive tricolpate pollen7, but also on macro- and mesofossils thought to be related to basal lineages8,9. Among the pieces of evidence, some records are related to Ranunculales and Proteales8,9, which are the two earliest diverging lineages of eudicots according to molecular analyses10. However, in contrast to the extant families of Ranunculales, there are huge differences and remarkable gaps in gross morphologies between those of Proteales, i.e., Sabiaceae, Nelumbonaceae, Platanaceae, and Proteaceae9. Their close phylogenetic relationship was thus not suspected before advances in molecular phylogenetics9,10,11, and potential morphological synapomorphies supporting their shared common ancestry started to be ascertained thereafter12,13. In addition, all these families occur in Cretaceous floras and Nelumbonaceae, Platanaceae, and Proteaceae particularly stand out by their relative abundance and richness in the fossil record9. Unfortunately, few intermediate forms linking the morphologies of these families have been found, and it seemed unlikely that they would be found since Nelumbonaceae and Platanaceae have undergone a long period of relative morphological stasis14,15.

Representatives of Nelumbonaceae are thought to have remained more or less similar in terms of their gross morphologies from the late Early Cretaceous to the present day, and they are relatively diverse not only through geologic time but also across the world. For instance, Nelumbites Berry is found in the middle Albian of Kazakhstan16, the upper Albian of Siberia17, and the middle and upper Albian Potomac Group of Virginia (USA)18,19, and the latter was confirmed its nelumbonaceous relationship by a cladistic analysis19. There are also Exnelumbites Estrada-Ruiz, Upchurch, Wolfe et Cevallos-Ferriz from the Campanian to the Maastrichtian of Mexico20, and Nelumbago McIver et Basinger and Paleonelumbo Knowlton documented from the Paleocene of Canada21 and Colorado (USA)22, respectively. Although numerous reports coming from Africa, Asia, Europe, and North and South America are attributed to Nelumbo Adans., most of them do not bear synapomorphies of the crown group and need a taxonomic reevaluation15,23,24,25. These fossils suggest that, mainly from the Late Cretaceous onwards, Nelumbonaceae, including Nelumbo, have had a nearly worldwide distribution, mostly in the Northern Hemisphere. Today, the genus has a relictual disjunct distribution with two extant species, i.e., wild populations of N. lutea (Willd.) Pers. in southern North America and N. nucifera Gaertn. in southern Asia to Australasia25,26.

In this paper, we describe a new fossil-genus and fossil-species of Nelumbonaceae from the Crato Formation of Brazil. This new macrofossil-taxon from the middle Early Cretaceous not only represents the earliest occurrence of this family known to date but also displays a mosaic of traits finally bridging the morphological gap between Nelumbonaceae and their woody sister clade consisting of Platanaceae and Proteaceae.

The sedimentary Araripe Basin (NE Brazil) includes several lithological units among which the Santana Group stands out in yielding fossil lagerstätten, especially that from the Crato Formation27,28. The Crato Formation mainly represents a lacustrine paleoenvironment documented by laminated limestones29. In these lacustrine rocks, especially the stratigraphically youngest C6 carbonate unit, countless fossils of vertebrates, invertebrates, and plants are found28,29. Such abundance of fossils and their often remarkable preservation have led to the designation of the Crato Formation as a Konservat-Lagerstätte28. Its scientific value is demonstrated by the fact that it contains one of the currently best records for understanding mid-Early Cretaceous low-latitude paleo-ecosystems28,30. The age of the Crato Formation has usually been considered to be upper Aptian31,32, but there is no longer a consensus since new age estimates for the Santana Group, together with an updated concept and position for the international chronostratigraphic unit Aptian, suggest that at least a lowermost Aptian age (ca. 121 Ma) is more plausible (see in Methods)29,33,34,35,36. Furthermore, the usual lack of information on the detailed lithostratigraphic positions of fossils collected from the C6 unit of the Crato Fossil Lagerstätte raises the question of whether particular organisms existed simultaneously or not since the laminated limestone section represents a substantial time interval (200 to 500 ka–see estimates of Neumann et al.29). The latter fact complicates reconstructions of the paleoecological context of certain fossil biotas from the lagerstätte.

The macrofossil assemblage of the Crato Formation includes a few spore-bearing plants but it is dominated by seed plants (i.e., gymnosperms and angiosperms)30. Angiosperms show a notably high taxonomic diversity and wide paleoecological spectrum even though not all fossil elements have been formally described yet37. Mesangiosperms make up the bulk of described fossils, including magnoliids38,39,40,41, monocots6,42, and eudicots8. By contrast, only a few records were assigned to the ANA grade, specifically Nymphaeales43,44. In addition, the angiosperm pollen records are mainly represented by monocolpate and tricolpate forms and may support the presence of chloranthoid, magnoliid, monocot, and eudicot taxa28,32,37.

Angiospermae Lindley (P.D.Cantino et M.J.Donoghue).

Eudicotyledoneae M.J.Donoghue, J.A.Doyle et P.D.Cantino.

Order Proteales Juss. ex Berchtold et J.Presl.

Family Nelumbonaceae A.Rich.

Notocyamus Gobo, Coiffard, Bachelier, L.Kunzmann, Conceição et Iannuzzi, gen.nov.

Aquatic angiosperm with herbaceous rhizomatous growth habit, with adventitious roots and long-petiolate, alternate simple leaves. Leaf with marginal petiole attachment, unlobed and untoothed margin, and distinctly papillate epidermis with anomocytic and (brachy-) paracytic stomata on both sides. Primary venation palinactinodromous, distally bifurcating, with agrophic veins. Major secondary venation festooned brochidodromous. Fruit solitary, terminal, and aggregate, derived from an apocarpous gynoecium with fruitlets embedded in an enlarged ellipsoidal receptacle, attached to a long woody peduncle. Fruitlets inserted in pits and free from the receptacle.

Noto is derived from notos from Ancient Greek νότος (south) and cyamus from Ancient Greek κύαμος (bean), in reference to the Egyptian "bean" described by Theophrastos of Eresos, which was probably a lotus seed.

PFN003134

Notocyamus hydrophobus Gobo, Coiffard, Bachelier, L. Kunzmann, Conceição et Iannuzzi, sp. nov.

The main diagnostic characters of Notocyamus gen. nov. are the palinactinodromous leaf venation, in which lateral primary veins branch successively rather than from one point, and the secondary xylem in the peduncle, which are distinct from any living Nelumbo or any fossil-genus in the family.

Notocyamus hydrophobus Gobo, Coiffard, Bachelier, L. Kunzmann, Conceição et Iannuzzi, sp. nov.

Lamina noto- to mesophyllous in size with L/W ratio ca. 1, chartaceous, obovate to elliptical, with obtuse and rounded to slightly cordate base and obtuse and rounded to straight-sided apex. Interior secondaries and intersecondary veins present. Tertiary venation mixed percurrent, predominantly opposite. Quaternary venation mixed percurrent, mostly alternate. Quinternary veins regular reticulate. Areolation five- to six-sided. Freely ending veinlets absent. Marginal ultimate venation looped.

hydrophobus is derived from Ancient Greek ὑδροφόβος meaning fearing water, in relation to the epidermis structure similar to the superhydrophobic epidermis of living lotus.

MB.Pb. 2002/1047 (repository: Museum für Naturkunde—Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin, Germany), Fig. 1.

Notocyamus hydrophobus gen. nov. et sp. nov. (holotype, MB. Pb. 2002/1047). (A) Overview of the whole plant, with roots, rhizome, leaves, and aggregate fruit in organic connection. A black arrow points to the part of the peduncle used to make the thin sections (see Figs. 5 and 6). (B) Details of higher-order venation. (C) Close-up of palinactinodromous venation and the marginal lamina attachment. (D) Close-up on the enlarged receptacle showing two globose fruitlets (presumed nutlets). Scale bars: 1 cm.

SMF (SM.B 16.522) (repository: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum, Frankfurt am Main, Germany), Fig. 2.

Notocyamus hydrophobus gen. nov. et sp. nov. (paratype, SMF SM.B 16.522). (A) Isolated leaf. (B, C) Close-ups of the pattern of venation. Note that abundant structures interpreted as galls occur along the lamina and petiole (arrows point to some of them). Scale bars: 5 mm.

PFN003135

Opencast pit(s) southwest of Nova Olinda, Ceará, Brazil. Lower Cretaceous (uppermost Barremian?/lowermost Aptian), C6 limestone horizon, Crato Formation, Santana Group, Araripe Basin.

Vegetative structures are preserved as reddish-brown replacement fossils and/or impressions with or without a thin iron oxide covering layer. Tissues of the peduncle are also replaced by iron oxide, while the receptacle is a mold with two casts of fruitlets. Clastic material is especially abundant on the rhizome of the holotype, and also in the petiole of the paratype.

The holotype is about 50 cm long and 25 cm wide and consists of a rhizome bearing about 30 roots, 13 leaves, and a single aggregate fruit with two visible fruitlets embedded in an enlarged receptacle (Fig. 1). The rhizome is unbranched and about 15 cm long and 1–2 cm wide. The roots are adventitious and up to at least 20 cm long and 0.3 cm wide.

The leaves are petiolate, alternate and simple. Petioles are 12–20 cm long by 0.5–1 cm width. The position of the lamina attachment to the petiole is marginal. Laminar sizes are noto- to mesophyllous, 60 to 95 mm long, and about 60 to 100 mm wide. Laminar shapes are obovate to elliptical, slightly medially asymmetrical to symmetrical, with a length/width (L/W) ratio of about 1. The lamina texture is likely chartaceous. Leaves are unlobed with untoothed margins, obtuse and rounded to slightly cordate bases, and obtuse and rounded to straight-sided apices. The primary venation is palinactinodromous with five primary veins running decurrently basally and bifurcating once or twice distally (Figs. 1C and 2). Naked basal veins are absent, and agrophic veins are present. The midvein is around 0.5–1 mm wide while the lateral primaries are about 0.3–0.8 mm wide. The major secondary venation consists of festooned brochidodromous veins (Figs. 1B and 2B), which are about 0.08–0.14 mm wide. Interior secondaries and intersecondaries are present. The course of the minor secondaries is simple brochidodromous, and a perimarginal vein is absent. The spacing of secondary veins decreases gradually toward the lamina base. Their attachment to the primaries is excurrent and forms a uniform acute angle (about 40°) to the primary veins. Intercostal tertiary veins are mostly opposite percurrent, with convex to sinuous courses (Figs. 1B and 2B). They are obtuse to nearly perpendicular to the midvein with angles decreasing exmedially and are about 0.06–0.09 mm wide. Exterior tertiaries form loops. The quaternary veins are mostly alternate percurrent and about 0.04–0.07 mm wide (Figs. 1B and 2B). Quinternary veins are regular reticulate and about 0.02–0.03 mm wide (Figs. 1B and 3B). The areolation is well developed, 5- to 6-sided (Fig. 3B). Freely ending veinlets are absent. Marginal ultimate venation is looped (Figs. 1B and 2B). Vein density ranges between 7.8–9.9 mm−1 (mean: 9 mm−1).

Notocyamus hydrophobus gen. nov. et sp. nov. (holotype, MB. Pb. 2002/1047). (A–F) SEM images of leaf. (A) Leaf cross-section showing differentiation of the mesophyll into upper palisade parenchyma with elongate and cylindrical cells, and lower spongy parenchyma with irregular and globose cells. (B) Quinternary leaf veins forming 5–6 sided polygons (areoles) and delimiting areas with undulate walls interpreted as being from the parenchyma (in transversal section). (C–D) Upper epidermis. (C) Papillae on the adaxial leaf surface. (D, F) Stomata and their neighboring epidermal cells bearing papillae (E–F) Lower epidermis. (E) Papillae on the abaxial leaf surface. Abbreviations: us—upper surface; pp—palisade parenchyma; sp—spongy parenchyma; ls—lower surface; pc—parenchyma cells; qv—quinternary veins; p—papilla; s—stoma. Scale bars: A, B = 100 µm; C = 10 µm; D, E, F = 50 µm.

The leaves are bifacial and 0.5 mm thick (Fig. 3A). The upper epidermis is uniseriate and papillate, and 20–25 µm thick. Epidermal cells are penta- to heptagonal, 30–70 µm long and 25–45 µm wide, with 3–4 µm thick straight anticlinal cell walls and a single papilla per cell (Fig. 3A,D). These papillae are 10–25 µm in diameter and 15–20 µm high (Fig. 3C,D). The lower epidermis is also uniseriate, papillate, and 20–30 µm thick. Its cells are essentially similar in shape to those of the upper epidermis, but slightly smaller and 30–50 µm long and 25–30 µm wide (Fig. 3A,E,F). They also display 3–5 µm thick straight anticlinal cell walls and a single well-developed papilla per cell. However, these papillae are also slightly smaller than those of the upper epidermis and 8–25 µm in diameter and 10–15 µm high (Fig. 3E,F). The leaves are amphistomatic with a stomatal density (SD) of about 60–150 mm−2 adaxially, and 100–120 mm−2 abaxially. The stomata are usually 30–35 µm long and 8–30 µm wide, with 15–25 µm long apertures randomly oriented. When the outer periclinal walls of the epidermis are abraded, their guard cells are often kidney-shaped (Fig. 4A,B). The cells in contact with the guard cells are variously shaped, rectangular-polygonal and often asymmetrically in outline, with straight anticlinal cell walls. If these lateral cells belong to the stomatal complexes, the complexes would be (brachy-) paracytic but otherwise anomocytic. In the non-abraded case, the two lateral neighboring cells often partly overlap the guard cells, resulting in a narrow elliptical outline of the stomata in outer surface view (Fig. 3D,F). Compared to the abraded case, the rectangular lateral neighboring cells are often not clearly distinguishable from the ordinary epidermal cells that are characterized by a single papilla on the periclinal walls (Figs. 3D,F and 4). The mesophyll displays a clear dorsiventral organization with an upper/adaxial palisade parenchyma and a lower spongy parenchyma (Fig. 3A). The single cell-layered palisade parenchyma is about 100–150 µm thick, and comprises cylindrical cells with 15–25 widths which display 1–2 µm thick primary walls. The spongy parenchyma is about 300–350 µm thick and consists of more or less globose to irregularly shaped cells that are 20–60 µm in diameter, with 3–4 µm thick primary walls. However, most of these cells are collapsed and their organization is not clear even though some lacunae can be observed.

Notocyamus hydrophobus gen. nov. et sp. nov. (holotype, MB. Pb. 2002/1047). (A) SEM image of upper leaf epidermis showing abraded zones without periclinal walls. (B) drawing of epidermal cells and their paracytic and anomocytic stomata. The guard cells are colored in blue and subsidiary cells in orange. Scale bars: 100 µm.

The peduncle of the fruit is 22.5 cm long and 4 mm wide and ends with the hollow mold of the fruit. The fruit is formed by an enlarged ellipsoidal receptacle, which is 2.5 cm long and 4 cm wide (Fig. 1D). It exhibits two globose fruitlets that are about 0.5 cm in diameter and embedded in distinct receptacular pits. Although the distribution of pits on the receptacle remains unclear, the fruit is interpreted as an aggregate derived from an apocarpous gynoecium, where each carpel develops into a fruitlet, likely a nutlet, with an estimated volume of 65 mm3 on average. No traces or remains of a perianth or other floral/fruit structures are observed below or around the receptacle.

The peduncle shows a pith surrounded by primary xylem bundles and secondary homoxylic (vesselless) xylem without growth rings, and is surrounded by a (peripheral) discontinuous layer interpreted as the remains of the cambial zone (Figs. 5 and 6).

The pith is ovate and 0.6–1.5 mm in diameter (Fig. 5). No tissue is preserved at the center of the pith, but it is unclear whether it was originally hollow or not.

The inner ring of primary xylem comprises ca. 18(19?) xylem bundles, with cells that are unevenly isodiametric and have a 13 to 60 µm wide diameter and a 4–10 µm thick wall (Fig. 5B). Walls of the xylem cells usually have helical and scalariform thickenings (Fig. 6B). Vessel elements are present and appear closer to the pith. They are usually rectangular, upright to drum-shaped, about 40–286 µm long and 17–60 µm wide, and although they are sometimes poorly preserved, scalariform-like pits occur in their side walls and simple perforation plates typically occur in their end walls (Fig. 6A,C).

The homoxylic wood (secondary xylem) consists predominantly of cells interpreted as fibers separated by 19 parenchymatous, homocellular, and usually multiseriate (rarely uniseriate) rays that are about 30–120 µm wide (Fig. 5A). In contrast to the primary xylem cells, the fibers appear more uniform in diameter (15–30 µm), with a 5–10 µm thick wall, a very small lumen, and simple and slit-like pits (Figs. 5A, 6D). Ray cells are also usually more regular, rectangular, and upright, and have a 3–8 µm thick wall with slit-like pit apertures (Fig. 6A,E,F). Near the pith, they connect with the primary xylem (Fig. 5).

The cambial zone is very poorly preserved. However, it comprises compressed fusiform and elongated cells outside the secondary xylem, from which arise new vascular increments with tracheary elements characterized by scalariform-like pits, including fibers with simple pits (Figs. 5A and 6F,G). These vascular increments are probably derived from anomalous secondary growth.

The anatomy of the petiole also includes vessel elements, which are 65–75 µm in diameter and have 5 µm thick secondary walls with scalariform pits and scalariform perforation plates (Fig. 7). However, in contrast to that the peduncle, it also has abundant aerenchymatous channels (seen as lacunae) and lacks secondary growth.

Notocyamus hydrophobus gen. nov. et sp. nov. (holotype, MB. Pb. 2002/1047). (A–B) Transversal section of the peduncle. (A) Overview displaying homoxylic wood with abundant fibers interspersed with parenchymatous rays. The dashed outline shows the rays connecting with primary xylem that form bundles near the pith. On the periphery, remains of the cambial zone occur in a discontinuous layer that is followed by new vascular increments. (B) Close-up of region near pith showing the primary xylem bundles and their connection with the rays. Abbreviations: pi—pith; px—primary xylem; sx—secondary xylem; r—ray; cz—cambial zone; vi—vascular increments; pxb—primary xylem bundles. Scale bars: A = 1 mm; B = 250 µm.

Notocyamus hydrophobus gen. nov. et sp. nov. (holotype, MB. Pb. 2002/1047). Radial (A–G) and tangential (H) sections of the peduncle. (A) Overview of region adjacent to the pith (to the far right) showing vessels in the xylem followed by the secondary xylem with ray and fiber cells (to the far left). (B) Primary xylem cells with helical thickenings and fibers of secondary xylem. (C) A vessel element with scalariform-like pits and simple perforation plates (arrows). (D) Close-up of a fiber showing simple (black arrow) and slit-like pits (white arrow). (E) Ray cells with slit-like pit apertures. (F) Overview of region near cambial zone (dashed outline) showing fiber and ray cells in the secondary xylem followed by the layer that gives rise to the new vascular increments. (G) Fusiform and compressed cells from the cambial zone followed by tracheary elements with scalariform-like pits. (H) Ray cells in between fibers of secondary xylem. Abbreviations: v—vessels; px—primary xylem; r—ray; f—fiber; cz—cambial zone; vi—vascular increments. Scale bars: A, F = 200 µm; B, C, E, G = 50 µm; D = 25 µm; H = 100 µm.

Notocyamus hydrophobus gen. nov. et sp. nov. (holotype, MB. Pb. 2002/1047). (A–C) SEM images of longitudinal views of the petiole. (A) Overview of vessel elements. (B) Close-up of a vessel element showing the scalariform pits. (C) Close-up of a scalariform perforation plate. Scale bars: A = 100 µm; B, C = 20 µm.

A single insect herbivory trace identified as Damage Type (DT) 125 linked to the Functional Feeding Group (FFG) Galling was found in Notocyamus (Fig. 2), following the classification guidelines of Labandeira45. The galled tissue is thick, circular, and discoidal in shape, and the bodies can be aggregated to one another or isolated along the leaf and petiole. They are about 0.6–1.4 mm long and 0.7–1.44 mm wide.

Our cladistic analysis (Fig. 8) was performed using the matrices by Kvaček et al.46 and Coiro et al.47 with the D&E backbone from Endress & Doyle48. Our results show that the single most parsimonious position of Notocyamus is within Proteales, as sister to Nelumbo (Nelumbonaceae), and supported by synapomorphies of the two taxa within Proteales, such as the lack of freely ending veinlets (CH14), solitary flowers (CH43), and the presence of pits in receptacle bearing individual carpels (CH52). The herbaceous habit (CH1) and anomocytic stomata (CH37) are also shared between them and could equally be synapomorphies among Proteales since all other taxa (including Sabiaceae) are woody and predominantly possess paracytic and laterocytic stomata (modified to anomocytic in some Platanaceae and Sabiaceae)49,50. However, the point on the tree at which these shared character states arose is ambiguous. Chloranthoid teeth (CH36) are a plesiomorphic character widespread in basal eudicots12, and their loss is a synapomorphy of Proteales (modified to platanoid teeth in Platanaceae). However, Notocyamus and Nelumbo still differ in the scoring of cambium (CH6), vessel perforation (CH09), leaf shape (CH30), and base of blade (CH33), and by the presence of paracytic stomata (CH37). In Proteales, loss of cambium (CH6) and evolution of peltate leaves (CH33) are autapomorphies of Nelumbo.

The position sister to Magnoliales and Laurales is one step less parsimonious and supported by the fiber pitting (CH10), and the presence of solitary flowers (CH43) (common in Magnoliales). However, they differ markedly from Notocyamus and Nelumbo in having freely ending veinlets (CH14) (lacking only in Lauraceae), pinnate major venation (CH31) (modified to palmate in a few Laurales), and in lacking pits in the receptacle (CH52).

We also found an alternative two step less parsimonious position in Proteales with Notocyamus sister to Platanaceae + Proteaceae. This position is supported by mixed scalariform and simple vessel perforation plates (CH9), but it requires two origins of freely ending veinlets (CH14), solitary flowers (CH43), and receptacle with carpel-bearing pits (CH52), or one origin of these features followed by a reversal in Platanus and Proteaceae.

Three additional two step less parsimonious positions were retrieved among magnoliids, with Notocyamus sister to either Piperales or Galbulimima in Magnoliales, and monocot. The alternate position as sister to Piperales is supported by palmate venation (CH31) but requires one more step in each of these characters (CH14, CH43, CH52) than the position with Nelumbo. The position sister to Galbulimima is supported by vessel perforation (CH9) and fiber pitting (CH10) but also requires one more step in several characters, in this case due to the woody habit (CH01), vessel grouping (CH11), freely ending veinlets (CH14), pinnate major venation (CH30) and the absence of pits in the receptacle (CH51). The position as sister to monocot is supported by leaf shape (CH30) but requires one more step in each of these characters (CH31, CH43, CH52) than the position with Nelumbo.

Cladistic analysis of the position of Notocyamus hydrophobus gen. nov. et sp. nov. in the phylogeny of living angiosperms after its addition to the matrices of Kvaček et al.46 and Coiro et al.47. Color scales indicate all most parsimonious positions in red (MP), and that one step less parsimonious in yellow (MP + 1) and two steps less parsimonious in green (MP + 2).

Notocyamus is described from the late Barremian?/Aptian of Brazil and is thus older than the previously oldest representative of its clade, i.e., Nelumbites extenuinervis from the middle to upper Albian of USA18,19, but also than isolated leaves of Nelumbites from Kazakhstan16. Its older age is consistent with the fact that several of its morphological characters are more plesiomorphic than those of Albian Nelumbites and extant Nelumbo. In addition, molecular dating indicates that the divergence time of Nelumbonaceae and Platanaceae is around 83 to 123 Ma14,19,51,52,53. These older age estimates are very close to the first pieces of evidence from the fossil record of this family even though their divergence time could still be earlier14,54.

Our findings also raise questions on the paleogeographic origin of the family since until our study, distributions of all previous fossil records suggested an origin of Nelumbo in Laurasian mid-latitudes25. Also, Ramírez-Barahona et al.55 suggest that the ancestral biome of Nelumbonaceae is most likely coupled with more temperate than tropical climates. However, whether their initial evolutionary history is linked to Laurasian mid-latitude areas and ancestral temperate biomes25,55, or not, remains unclear. Our report preliminarily suggests that the initial evolution of Nelumbonaceae may have occurred in northern Gondwanan low-latitude areas under a seasonal tropical climate since Notocyamus is currently the oldest record of this family and displays traits interpreted as ancestral for the family. This new Brazilian fossil also adds data to postulate that the paleoequatorial tropical areas were an important center of early diversification of basal eudicots in the Early Cretaceous before reaching mid-latitude areas, where they became widespread from the Albian onwards. This hypothesis was discussed by Doyle5 based on fossil pollen records and is currently being reinforced by an increasing number of macrofossils of basal eudicots described from the Crato Formation8, but also by evidence from tricolpate pollen already reported in this same lithostratigraphic unit32.

In terms of habit and morphology, Notocyamus resembles living Nelumbonaceae and implies a paleoecology adapted to similar aquatic conditions (see reconstruction, Fig. 9). In contrast to the woody habit of the other Proteales, fossil and extant members of the family share the same rhizomatous habit26,56 (Fig. 1A). In addition, the presence of long petioles in both Notocyamus (Figs. 1A and 2A) and living Nelumbonaceae enables the laminae to reach the water surface and beyond. In Nelumbo, this elongation is conditioned to water depth and flooding events, and this adaptive response is mediated by ethylene gas flowing through aerenchyma57,58. Such a specialized tissue with numerous air chambers is also present in the petiole of Notocyamus and living Nelumbonaceae. It also typically occurs in plants growing in aquatic-related environments under anoxic conditions, not only to allow sufficient oxygen levels to maintain respiration through gas canals but also to improve their mechanical support58,59,60.

The leaf epidermises of Notocyamus and living Nelumbo are also essentially similar by having anomocytic stomata (Fig. 3D,F) with similar density average values on the upper surfaces15,61, and dense papillae with superhydrophobic properties (Fig. 3), producing the famous "Lotus effect"62. The water-repellent nature of leaves facilitates water and dirt particles removal on the leaf surface and ensures stomata function and gas exchanges63,64. Such water-repellent leaf surfaces are especially common in herbaceous plants living in disturbed and wetland environments63. The only notable micromorphological difference is that the leaf of Notocyamus also bears likely (brachy-) paracytic stomata and distinct epidermal papillae on both sides, whereas those of Nelumbo are exclusively anomocytic and almost entirely epistomatic with papillae present only on their adaxial (upper) surfaces61,65,66,67. It suggests the development of emergent leaves in Notocyamus and subsequent exaptation of the Lotus effect in peltate leaves of Nelumbonaceae. Such emergent and amphistomatic leaves, despite being rare in Nelumbo, are also well-documented in other aquatic plant lineages59. In addition, the relatively high leaf vein density (ca. 9 mm−1) in Notocyamus may support a higher water supply capacity leading to a better leaf hydraulic conductance and consequently higher photosynthetic and transpiration rates68,69,70. As in living Nelumbo species, it would probably also allow establishment in sunny habitats under conditions of high temperatures.

Both Notocyamus and living Nelumbonaceae also display a typically enlarged floral receptacle that develops into an aggregate fruit with several nutlets embedded in pits26,71 (Fig. 1A,D). This kind of fruit is adapted to float in aquatic habitats and disperses its diaspores passively by hydrochory13,72. In addition, the reproductive organs associated with though not attached to the leaves of Nelumbites extenuinervis Upchurch, Crane et Drinnan, and Nelumbo puertae Gandolfo et Cuneo also share an enlarged receptacle with fruitlets18,23.

Reconstruction of Notocyamus hydrophobus gen. nov. et sp. nov. in its likely environment. Illustration by Rebecca Dart (Vancouver–British Columbia).

Notocyamus is unambiguously more closely related to Nelumbonaceae than to any other extant family. However, it also displays a unique combination of ancestral and derived characters, some of which are shared with other members of Proteales and may indicate that these structures represent a transitional stage between woody and herbaceous protealeans.

In terms of leaf architecture, the lobed and/or toothed margins common in almost all leaves of Platanus L. (Platanaceae) are unknown in Notocyamus, but both have similar palinactinodromous venation and marginal lamina attachment (Figs. 1A,C and 2A,C), as does Bellendena R.Br. (Proteaceae)73,74, suggesting that these traits were homologous in all these groups. This similarity is also seen in some Cretaceous platanoid leaves assigned to Credneria Zenker and Platanus, which also display palinactinodromous venation75. Notocyamus often shares the obovate to elliptical leaf shapes (Figs. 1A and 2A) with these fossils, and related lineages such as Proteaceae and Sabiaceae, which contrasts with the leaves of Nelumbo and its younger fossil relatives, indicating that Nelumbonaceae passed through this morphological stage before having orbicular leaves20.

The presence of paracytic and anomocytic stomata in Notocyamus may strengthen the concept of its mosaic of ancestral and derived characters. Since almost all woody protealeans vary between paracytic and laterocytic stomata, and Nelumbo has exclusively anomocytic stomata, this may suggest that Notocyamus is in a transitional form between ancestral (paracytic stomata) and derived (anomocytic stomata) anatomical traits.

If the leaf architecture of Notocyamus is considered to be plesiomorphic for the family, Notocyamus can be interpreted as a first evolutionary step towards Nelumbo. Nelumbites18, from the Albian, can be interpreted as a second evolutionary step. Its leaf blade is already peltate, but eccentric, its primary venation is actinomorphic but comprises only a few primaries (< 10), and its lamina is orbicular, displaying a basal indentation reminiscent of the sometimes-cordate leaf bases of Notocyamus. Exnelumbites20, from the Campanian–Maastrichtian, which can be interpreted as a third evolutionary step, is already centrally peltate but displays 12–13 primaries and surprisingly bears chloranthoid teeth. Paleonelumbo, from the Paleocene, is another genus with distinct leaf architecture: although its leaves are centrally peltate, they are quite distinct from those of Nelumbo in being lobed and having 10–15 primary veins15,20. Nelumbago, also from the Paleocene, is, however, very similar to extant and extinct species of Nelumbo in terms of foliar architecture and can therefore be interpreted as the next to last evolutionary step in having centrally peltate and entire-margined leaves with > 20 bifurcating primary veins but still no central disk15,20. All extinct and extant Nelumbonaceae cited above suggest that peltation of their leaves did not evolve until a certain time after the divergence of Nelumbonaceae.

Despite differing significantly in its leaf architecture by having a distinct primary venation type, Notocyamus exhibits a special similarity to Nelumbo in lacking the freely ending veinlets. This leaf character is rare in basal eudicots and occurs only in Nelumbonaceae in Proteales. In addition, Notocyamus and Nelumbo share the same entire-margined leaf blades, bifurcating primary venation, festooned brochidodromous secondary venation, tertiary and quaternary veins with mixed course, and six-sided areolae15,20.

In terms of reproductive structures, Notocyamus and other Nelumbonaceae both produce single flowers sharing an apomorphic feature: carpel-bearing pits in the receptacle. The shape of the floral receptacle appears to have evolved from ellipsoidal in Notocyamus, to slightly conical in Nelumbites extenuinervis and Nelumbo puertae18,23, culminating in the well-known obconical shape in Nelumbo. Although the reproductive organs of both Notocyamus and Nelumbo are borne on long peduncles (Fig. 1A), their peduncles are quite distinct anatomically76, because only Notocyamus has secondary xylem produced by a vascular cambium, as in other members of Proteales, which are woody plants. Interestingly, the secondary growth did not disappear in the nelumbonaceous line until some time after its divergence from other Proteales. In its peduncle, Notocyamus bears several water-conducing cells in each primary xylem bundle, and in the secondary xylem (wood) nonconductive cells (fibers with lignified walls) occur (Figs. 5 and 6). Most woody tissues of Notocyamus consist of fibers with simple and slit-like pits (Figs. 5 and 6D). These structures also occur in the most closely related lineages: Platanaceae usually have fiber tracheids with bordered and simple pits77, most genera of the Proteaceae have libriform fibers with simple and bordered pits78, and the majority of Sabiaceae taxa have libriform fibers with vestigial bordered pits79. Concerning the type of vessel perforation in the primary xylem, Notocyamus displays the same combination of simple and scalariform vessel perforation plates as Platanaceae, Proteaceae, and Sabiaceae, suggesting that this state could be a synapomorphy of the Proteales, but Nelumbo may represent a reversal of this trend. The specialization of vessel perforation plates from scalariform to simple has long been interpreted as derived and occurred several times in different lineages80,81.

Fossils of Proteales show that members of this group already inhabited contrasting environments during the Early Cretaceous, with terrestrial woody Platanaceae and aquatic herbaceous Nelumbonaceae. Unfortunately, macrofossils of Proteaceae and Sabiaceae are sporadic in the Cretaceous and better recognized and described in Cenozoic floras9. However, fossil representatives of Nelumbonaceae and Platanaceae confirm that huge differences in gross morphology already existed between Cretaceous members of these families (e.g., Nelumbites, and Sapindopsis, respectively). In addition, the fossils show that the living Platanus and Nelumbo are similar to some of their Early Cretaceous members, and that these clades thus likely experienced early rapid morphological evolution followed by a long period of relative stasis.

Besides our results from cladistics supporting the position of Notocyamus as a stem-relative of Nelumbonaceae, the fossils not only push back the minimum age of the appearance of the lotus lineage to at least the early Aptian but also shed light on the morphological evolution of its vegetative and reproductive traits. Despite the putative stasis previously reported in this family, their stem lineages may still have undergone considerable morphological changes throughout geological time. In addition, our report surprisingly provides new lines of evidence that the divergence between Nelumbonaceae and other members of Proteales may have occurred in a stepwise fashion. Compared to other extinct nelumbonaceous fossils, Notocyamus displays a new and unique mosaic of ancestral states shared with Platanaceae and Proteaceae, and derived states shared with Nelumbo, and clarifies important evolutionary steps of Nelumbonaceae and Proteales as a whole. Thus, Notocyamus ideally fills the morphological gap between aquatic Nelumbonaceae and their most recent common ancestor with woody Proteales, and can therefore be seen as one of those "missing links" that are rarely preserved in the fossil record.

The fossils were studied using a Leica Wild M10 microscope equipped with a Leica DFC 425 camera. Overview images were taken with a Canon 250D camera. Vegetative structures (leaves, petiole, and peduncle) of Notocyamus exhibit anatomical details preserved by iron oxide replacement of tissues. These details were observed in a high vacuum with a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) (Carl Zeiss EVO 50 and EVO LS 10, Germany). For SEM analyses, pieces of leaves, petiole and peduncle were removed from the specimen, mounted on stubs, and coated with gold for four minutes with a Polaron SC7640 sputter coater. Photographs of fossils were edited with Adobe Photoshop software.

The description of leaf architecture follows Ellis et al.45.

The leaf width measurements of Notocyamus (holotype) were inferred from leaves with at least half the lamina preserved (including folded leaves), multiplying the distance from the midvein to the lamina margin by two supposing a symmetrical lamina shape. They were used to estimate the laminar size, L:W ratio, and leaf shape.

The vein density (mm of vein per mm2) of Notocyamus was calculated based on an SEM image (Fig. 3B) that best shows the length of quinternary veins. The measurements were made using the program ImageJ (https://imagej.nih.gov/).

The stomatal density (SD) on leaves of Notocyamus was calculated using seven SEM images from different leaf pieces on both adaxial and abaxial sides. The presence of stomata was counted on squares of 0.12 to 0.3 mm2 to calculate the stomata density in mm−2.

The volume of fruitlets was estimated based on the formula V = 4/3πr3, following Tiffney82.

Petrographic thin sections of the peduncle were made in the three standard sections used for studying wood anatomy: transversal, radial, and tangential (sensu Jones and Rowe83). Slides were analyzed and photographed using a Zeiss light microscope (Axioscope 5) coupled to a Canon 60D camera.

The phylogenetic analysis was performed by adding the fossil as a new taxon to the morphological data set from Kvaček et al.46 and Coiro et al.47 with character states presented in Supplementary Information, using the D&E backbone constraint tree48. The relative parsimony of all positions of the fossil was evaluated using Mesquite 3.6184, and the number of required character state changes (steps) in each alternative tree was recalculated. All characters were unordered and equally weighted.

The Crato Formation, the second lithostratigraphic unit from the base of the Santana Group, has been repeatedly dated as upper Aptian age based on palynological evidence32. By contrast, new results of Melo et al.34, Barreto et al.36 and Arai & Assine85 consistently revealed an upper Aptian age for the Romualdo Formation, the uppermost unit of the Santana Group, based on relative and absolute dating methods. In addition, the Ipubi Formation, which underlies the Romualdo Formation, contains two important layers for age estimation, the black shale at its base and the evaporite layer soon above. Lúcio et al.33 dated this evaporite layer by Re–Os isotope studies as 123 ± 3.5 Ma (126.5 to 119.5 Ma). Besides, isotope and organic geochemistry of this black shale provides strong evidence that it was deposited during the global Ocean Anoxic Event OAE-1a35. The numerical age of the base of OAE-1a, called the Selli event, is ca. 119–120 Ma86. Thus, the Crato Formation, underlying the Ipubi Formation, is at least older than 120 Ma, which is not far above the base of the Aptian, or even older if there was a hiatus between the formations27.

Since 2022, the updated international chronostratigraphic chart shows a new age for the base of the Aptian (121.4 Ma instead of 125 Ma), which is correlated with a short-lasting magnetostratigraphic zone87.

According to Neumann et al.29, the C6 carbonate unit of the Crato Formation could represent a period of up to 0.5 Ma. Altogether, the Crato limestones C1–C6 could likely represent several million years, which would extend its absolute age range towards the upper Barremian. However, such a fundamental change in the age of the Crato Formation needs to be supported by additional unambiguous evidence in future publications.

All data analyzed during the current study are included in this published article and its supplementary information file.

Buggs, R. J. A. The origin of Darwin's "abominable mystery". Am. J. Bot. 108, 22–36 (2021).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. Punctuated Equilibrium (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2007).

Book Google Scholar

Feild, T. S., Chatelet, D. S. & Brodribb, T. J. Ancestral xerophobia: A hypothesis on the whole plant ecophysiology of early angiosperms. Geobiology 7, 237–264 (2009).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Kvaček, J. et al. When and why nature gained angiosperms. In Nature Through Time: Virtual Field Trips Through the Nature of the Past (eds Martinetto, E., Tschopp, E. & Gastaldo, R. A.) 129–158 (Springer Nature, 2020).

Chapter Google Scholar

Doyle, J. A. The rise of angiosperms as seen in the African Cretaceous pollen record. Palaeoecol. Afr. 26, 3–29 (1999).

Google Scholar

Coiffard, C., Kardjiov, N., Manke, I. & Bernardes-de-Oliveira, M. E. C. Fossil evidence of core monocots in the Early Cretaceous. Nat. Plants 5, 691–696 (2019).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Coiro, M., Doyle, J. A. & Hilton, J. How deep is the conflict between molecular and fossil evidence on the age of angiosperms? New Phytol. 223, 83–99 (2019).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Gobo, W. V., Kunzmann, L., Iannuzzi, R., Bachelier, J. B. & Coiffard, C. First evidence of ranunculids in Early Cretaceous tropics. Sci. Rep. 12, 5040 (2022).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Friis, E. M., Crane, P. R. & Pedersen, K. R. Early Flowers and Angiosperm Evolution (Cambridge University Press, 2011).

Book Google Scholar

Sun, Y. et al. Phylogenomic and structural analyses of 18 complete plastomes across nearly all families of early-diverging eudicots, including an angiosperm-wide analysis of IR gene content evolution. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 96, 93–101 (2016).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 181, 1–20 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Doyle, J. A. & Endress, P. K. Morphological phylogenetic analysis of basal angiosperms: Comparison and combination with molecular data. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161, S121–S153 (2000).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Romanov, M. S., Bobrov, A. V. F. C. H., Romanova, E. S., Zdravchev, N. S. & Sorokin, A. N. Fruit development, structure and histology in Nelumbo (Nelumbonaceae: Proteales). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 198, 1–20 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Xue, J. H., Dong, W. P., Cheng, T. & Zhou, S. L. Nelumbonaceae: Systematic position and species diversification revealed by the complete chloroplast genome. J. Syst. Evol. 50, 477–487 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

Li, Y., Awasthi, N., Nosova, N. & Yao, J. X. Comparative study of leaf architecture and cuticles of Nelumbo changchangensis from the Eocene of Hainan Island, China, and the two extant species of Nelumbo (Nelumbonaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 180, 123–137 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Vakhrameev, A. The stratigraphy and the fossil flora of the Cretaceous deposits of western Kazakhstan. Reg. Stratigr. USSR 1, 1–340 (1952).

MathSciNet Google Scholar

Samylina, V. A. Early Cretaceous angiosperms of the Soviet Union based on leaf and fruit remains. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 61, 207–218 (1968).

Article Google Scholar

Upchurch, G. R., Crane, P. R. & Drinnan, A. N. The megaflora from the Quantico locality (upper Albian), Lower Cretaceous Potomac Group of Virginia. Va. Mus. Natl. Hist. Mem. 4, 1–57 (1994).

Google Scholar

Doyle, J. & Endress, P. K. Integrating Early Cretaceous fossils into the phylogeny of living angiosperms: Magnoliidae and eudicots. J. Syst. Evol. 48, 1–35 (2010).

Article Google Scholar

Estrada-Ruiz, E., Upchurch, J., Wolfe, J. A. & Cevallos-Ferriz, S. R. S. Comparative morphology of fossil and extant leaves of Nelumbonaceae, including a new genus from the Late Cretaceous of Western North America. Syst. Bot. 36, 337–351 (2011).

Article Google Scholar

McIver, E. E. & Basinger, J. F. Fossil flora of the Paleocene Ravenscrag Formation, southwestern Saskatchewan, Canada. Palaeontogr. Can. 10, 1–85 (1993).

Google Scholar

Knowlton, F. H. The flora of the Denver and associated formations of Colorado (No. 155). U.S. Geological Survey Professional Papers 155, 1–142 (1930).

Gandolfo, M. A. & Cuneo, R. N. Fossil Nelumbonaceae from the La Colonia Formation (Campanian–Maastrichtian, Upper Cretaceous), Chubut, Patagonia, Argentina. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 133, 169–178 (2005).

Article Google Scholar

Kahlert, E., Rüffle, L. & Gregor, D. H. J. Die Oberkreide-Flora (Campanian) von Baris (Ägypten) und ihre ökologisch-geographischen Beziehungen unter plattentektonischen Aspekten. Doc. Nat. 178, 1–71 (2009).

Google Scholar

Li, Y. et al. Paleobiogeography of the lotus plant (Nelumbonaceae: Nelumbo) and its bearing on the paleoclimatic changes. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 399, 284–293 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Kubitzki, K., Rohwer, J. G. & Bittrich, V. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants II. Flowering Plants Dicotyledons: Magnoliid, Hamamelid and Caryophyllid Families (Springer, 1993).

Google Scholar

Assine, M. L. et al. Sequências deposicionais do Andar Alagoas da Bacia do Araripe, Nordeste do Brasil. Bol. Geoci. Petrobras 22, 3–28 (2014).

Google Scholar

Martill, D. M., Bechly, G. & Loveridge, R. F. The Crato Fossil Beds of Brazil: Window into an Ancient World (Cambridge University Press, 2007).

Book Google Scholar

Neumann, V. H. M. L., Aragão, M. A. N. F., Valença, L. M. M. & Leal, J. P. Ambientes Lacustres. In Ambientes de Sedimentação Siliciclástica do Brasil 1st edn (eds Silva, A. J. C. L. P. et al.) 132–168 (Beca-BALL Edições, São Paulo, 2008).

Google Scholar

Kunzmann, L. et al. The Crato flora, a 115 million years old window into the Cretaceous world of Brazil. In Brazilian Paleofloras: From Paleozoic to Holocene (eds Iannuzzi, R. et al.) (Springer Nature, Cham, 2022).

Google Scholar

Coimbra, J. C. & Freire, T. M. Age of the Post-rift Sequence I from the Araripe Basin, Lower Cretaceous, NE Brazil: Implications for spatio-temporal correlation. Rev. Bras. Paleontol. 24, 37–46 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Heimhofer, U. & Hochuli, P.-A. Early Cretaceous angiosperm pollen from a low-latitude succession (Araripe Basin, NE Brazil). Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 161, 105–126 (2010).

Article Google Scholar

Lúcio, T., Neto, J. A. S. & Selby, D. Late Barremian/early Aptian Re–Os age of the Ipubi Formation black shales: Stratigraphic and paleoenvironmental implications for Araripe Basin, northeastern Brazil. J. South Am. Earth Sci. 102, 102699 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Melo, R. M. et al. New marine data and age accuracy of the Romualdo Formation, Araripe Basin, Brazil. Sci. Rep. 10, 15779 (2020).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Pontes, N. V. et al. Organic and isotopic geochemistry of evaporites and shales of the Santana Group (Araripe Basin, Brazil): clues on the evolution of depositional systems and global correlation during the Lower Cretaceous. Minerals 11, 1–21 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Barreto, A. M. F. et al. U/Pb geochronology of fossil fish dentine from Romualdo Formation, Araripe Basin, northeast of Brazil. J. South Am. Earth Sci. 116, 103774 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Coiffard, C. & Bernardes-de-Oliveira, M. E. C. Angiosperms in the Early Cretaceous of northern Gondwana: A track record. In Brazilian Paleofloras: From Paleozoic to Holocene (eds Iannuzzi, R. et al.) (Springer Nature, 2020).

Google Scholar

Mohr, B. A. & Eklund, H. Araripia florifera, a magnoliid angiosperm from the Lower Cretaceous Crato Formation (Brazil). Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 126, 279–292 (2003).

Article Google Scholar

Mohr, B. A. & Bernardes-de-Oliveira, M. E. C. Endressinia brasiliana, a magnolialean angiosperm from the Lower Cretaceous Crato Formation (Brazil). Int. J. Plant Sci. 165, 1121–1133 (2004).

Article Google Scholar

Mohr, B. A., Coiffard, C. & Bernardes-de-Oliveira, M. E. C. Schenkeriphyllum glanduliferum, a new magnolialean angiosperm from the Early Cretaceous of Northern Gondwana and its relationships to fossil and modern magnoliales. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 189, 57–72 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Coiffard, C., Mohr, B. A. & Bernardes-de-Oliveira, M. E. C. Hexagyne philippiana gen. et sp. nov., a piperalean angiosperm from the Early Cretaceous of northern Gondwana (Crato Formation, Brazil). Taxon 63, 1275–1286 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Coiffard, C., Mohr, B. A. & Bernardes-de-Oliveira, M. E. C. The Early Cretaceous aroid, Spixiarum kipea gen. et sp. nov., and implications on early dispersal and ecology of basal monocots. Taxon 62, 997–1008 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Mohr, B. A., Bernardes-de-Oliveira, M. E. C. & Taylor, D. W. Pluricarpellatia, a nymphaealean angiosperm from the Lower Cretaceous of northern Gondwana (Crato Formation, Brazil). Taxon 57, 1147–1158 (2008).

Article Google Scholar

Coiffard, C., Mohr, B. A. & Bernardes-de-Oliveira, M. E. C. Jaguariba wiersemana gen. nov. et sp. nov., an Early Cretaceous member of crown group Nymphaeales (Nymphaeaceae) from northern Gondwana. Taxon 62, 141–151 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Labandeira, C. C., Wilf, P., Johnson, K. R. & Marsh, F. Guide to Insect (and Other) Damage Types on Compressed Plant Fossils. Version 3.0 (Smithsonian Institution, 2007).

Google Scholar

Kvaček, J. et al. Pseudoasterophyllites cretaceus from the Cenomanian (Cretaceous) of the Czech Republic: A possible link between Chloranthaceae and Ceratophyllum. Taxon 65, 1345–1373 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Coiro, M., Martínez, L. C. A., Upchurch, G. R. & Doyle, J. A. Evidence for an extinct lineage of angiosperms from the Early Cretaceous of Patagonia and implications for the early radiation of flowering plants. New Phytol. 228, 344–360 (2020).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. & Doyle, J. A. Reconstructing the ancestral angiosperm flower and its initial specializations. Am. J. Bot. 96, 22–66 (2009).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Carpenter, R. J., Hill, R. S. & Jordan, G. J. Leaf cuticular morphology links Platanaceae and Proteaceae. Int. J. Plant Sci. 166, 843–855 (2005).

Article Google Scholar

van Beusekom, C. F. & van de Water, T. H. P. M. Sabiaceae. Flora Males. 10, 679–715 (1984).

Google Scholar

Magallón, S., Gómez-Acevedo, S., Sánchez-Reyes, L. L. & Hernández-Hernández, T. A metacalibrated time-tree documents the early rise of flowering plant phylogenetic diversity. New Phytol. 207, 437–453 (2015).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Li, H.-T. et al. Origin of angiosperms and the puzzle of the Jurassic gap. Nat. Plants 5, 461–470 (2019).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Silvestro, D. et al. Fossil data support a pre-Cretaceous origin of flowering plants. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 449–457 (2021).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Sanderson, M. J. & Doyle, J. A. Sources of error and confidence intervals in estimating the age of angiosperms from rbcL and 18S rDNA data. Am. J. Bot. 88, 1499–1516 (2001).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Ramírez-Barahona, S., Sauquet, H. & Magallón, S. The delayed and geographically heterogeneous diversification of flowering plant families. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1232–1238 (2020).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Kubitzki, K. The families and genera of vascular plants IX. Flowering Plants Eudicots: Berberidopsidales, Buxales, Crossosomatales, Fabales p.p., Geraniales, Gunnerales, Myrtales p.p., Proteales, Saxifragales, Vitales, Zygophyllales, Clusiaceae Alliance, Passifloraceae Alliance, Dilleniaceae, Huaceae, Picramniaceae, Sabiaceae (Springer, 2007)

Nohara, S. & Kimura, M. Growth characteristics of Nelumbo nucifera Gaerm. in response to water depth and flooding. Ecol. Res. 12, 11–20 (1997).

Article Google Scholar

Schweingruber, F. H., Kučerová, A., Adamec, L. & Doležal, J. Anatomic Atlas of Aquatic and Wetland Plant Stems (Springer Nature, 2020).

Book Google Scholar

Evert, R. F. Esau's Plant Anatomy: Meristems, Cells, and Tissues of the Plant Body—Their Structure, Function, and Development 3rd edn. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2006).

Book Google Scholar

Pan, Y. et al. The anatomy of lotus fibers found in petioles of Nelumbo nucifera. Aquat. Bot. 95, 167–171 (2011).

Article Google Scholar

Kaul, R. B. Anatomical observations on floating leaves. Aquat. Bot. 2, 215–234 (1976).

Article Google Scholar

Ensikat, H. J., Ditsche-Kuru, P., Neinhuis, C. & Barthlott, W. Superhydrophobicity in perfection: The outstanding properties of the lotus leaf. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2, 152–161 (2011).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Neinhuis, C. & Barthlott, W. Characterization and distribution of water-repellent, self-cleaning plant surfaces. Ann. Bot. 79, 667–677 (1997).

Article Google Scholar

Kim, I. S. Epidermal features of the Nelumbo nucifera tissues and Lotus effect. Korean J. Microsc. 42, 95–103 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

Hall, T. F. & Penfound, W. T. The biology of the American lotus, Nelumbo lutea (Wild.) Pers. Am. Midl. Nat. 31, 744–758 (1944).

Article Google Scholar

Gupta, S. C., Paliwal, G. S. & Ahuja, R. The stomata of Nelumbo nucifera: Formation, distribution and degeneration. Am. J. Bot. 55, 295–301 (1968).

Article Google Scholar

Vogel, S. Contributions to the functional anatomy and biology of Nelumbo nucifera (Nelumbonaceae)—I. Pathways of air circulation. Plant Syst. Evol. 249, 9–25 (2004).

Article Google Scholar

Sack, L. & Holbrook, N. M. Leaf hydraulics. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 57, 361–381 (2006).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Brodribb, T. J., Feild, T. S. & Jordan, G. J. Leaf maximum photosynthetic rate and venation are linked by hydraulics. Plant Physiol. 144, 1890–1898 (2007).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Feild, T. S. et al. Fossil evidence for low gas exchange capacities for Early Cretaceous angiosperm leaves. Paleobiology 37, 195–213 (2011).

Article Google Scholar

Simpson, M. C. Diversity and classification of flowering plants: eudicots. In Plant Systematics (ed. Simpson, M. C.) 275–448 (Elsevier Inc, 2010).

Chapter Google Scholar

Hayes, V., Schneider, E. L. & Carlquist, S. Floral development of Nelumbo nucifera (Nelumbonaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 161, S183–S191 (2000).

Article Google Scholar

Doyle, J. A. Systematic value and evolution of leaf architecture across the angiosperms in light of molecular phylogenetic analyses. Cour. Forsch. Inst. Senckenberg 258, 21–37 (2007).

Google Scholar

Ellis, B. et al. Manual of Leaf Architecture (Cornell University Press, 2009).

Book Google Scholar

Tschan, G. F., Denk, T. & von Balthazar, M. Credneria and Platanus (Platanaceae) from the Late Cretaceous (Santonian) of Quedlinburg, Germany. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 152, 211–236 (2008).

Article Google Scholar

Esau, K. The phloem of Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. Ann. Bot. 39, 901–913 (1975).

Article Google Scholar

Brush, W. D. Distinguishing characters of North American sycamore woods. Bot. Gaz. 64, 480–496 (1917).

Article Google Scholar

Chattaway, M. M. The wood anatomy of the Proteaceae. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1, 279–302 (1948).

Article Google Scholar

Carlquist, S., Morrell, P. L. & Manchester, S. R. Wood anatomy of Sabiaceae (s. l.); Ecological and systematic implications. Aliso 13, 521–549 (1993).

Google Scholar

Feild, T. S. & Wilson, J. P. Evolutionary voyage of angiosperm vessel structure-function and its significance for early angiosperm success. Int. J. Plant Sci. 173, 596–609 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

Feild, T. S. & Brodribb, T. J. Hydraulic tuning of vein cell microstructure in the evolution of angiosperm venation networks. New Phytol. 199, 720–726 (2013).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Tiffney, B. H. Seed size, dispersal syndromes, and the rise of the angiosperms: Evidence and hypothesis. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 71, 551–576 (1984).

Article Google Scholar

Jones, T. P. & Rowe, N. P. Fossil Plants and Spores: Modern Techniques 396 (Geological Society of London, 1999).

Google Scholar

Maddison, W. P. & Maddison, D. R. Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. Version 3.61 (2019). http://www.mesquiteproject.org

Arai, M. & Assine, M. L. Chronostratigraphic constraints and palaeoenvironmental interpretation of the Romualdo Formation (Santana Group, Araripe Basin, Northeastern Brazil) based on palynology. Cretac. Res. 116, 104610 (2020).

Gale, A. S., Mutterlose, J. & Batenburg, S. The Cretaceous period. In The Geologic Time Scale (eds Gradstein, F. M. et al.) 1023–1086 (Elsevier, 2020).

Google Scholar

International Commission of Stratigraphy. International Chronostratigraphic Chart v2022/10 (2022). http://www.stratigraphy.org/ICSchart/ChronostratChart2020-03.pdf.

Download references

We would like to thank the staff of the Museum of Natural History, Berlin (MfN); the curator of the collection, Ludwig Luthardt, for all support provided in the whole process; Cornelia Hiller, Catrin Puffert for their assistance in the curatorial work; Kirsten Born and Anke Sänger for her support with the SEM; Margot Belot for technical help at the photography studio; Marten Schöle and Karen Helm-Knapp for doing, respectively, the preparation and thin sections of the peduncle. Also, we acknowledge Dieter Uhl and Karin Schmidt from Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt am Main for being available to give support to research on the fossils stored in the paleontological collection. Last but not least, we thank James Doyle for his valuable comments for improving the scientific content and English style corrections, and the other anonymous reviewer for general commenting.

The authors are members of a Brazilian-German scientific network initiated for collaborative paleontological-geological investigations in the Brazilian Araripe Basin. In particular, the present paper contains results of the bilateral research project "Towards an integrated analysis of the Early Cretaceous Crato Fossil Lagerstätte" that receives funding support from the CAPES-DAAD PROBRAL Program. The project agenda necessarily implies investigations of specimens in public scientific collections in different countries. We highly acknowledge the friendly invitation from the Museum für Naturkunde Berlin Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science (Germany), and Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt (Germany) to openly study their collections of Crato plant fossils and to allow publication of the results despite the ongoing and unresolved issues about the legality of these fossils in German institutional collections. Their support to open science and the doctoral project of the first author are greatly appreciated. The authors are aware of official contacts between Brazilian and German institutions in this matter. Together with these institutions and their regulatory political authorities, the authors are actively seeking a solution through solid scientific collaboration in the near future that can meet the demands regarding the proper safeguarding of paleontological heritage.

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work is part of the Ph.D. thesis of the first author and was funded by the CAPES-DAAD PROBRAL mobility program (CAPES ID 88881.198776/2018–01; DAAD ID-57446885) and Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico—CNPq), as a Ph.D. scholarship for W.V.G (Process 142135/2018–6), and a fellowship for R.I (Process PQ313946/2021–3). D.M.C. thanks FUNCAP (Fundação Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento) for her fellowship (Process 00424072/2022).

Departamento de Paleontologia e Estratigrafia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Rio Grande do Sul, Ave. Bento Gonçalves 9500, Porto Alegre, 91501-970, Brazil

William Vieira Gobo, Roberto Iannuzzi & Thamiris Barbosa dos Santos

Abteilung Museum für Mineralogie und Geologie, Senckenberg Naturhistorische Sammlungen Dresden, Königsbrücker Landstrasse. 159, D–01109, Dresden, Germany

Lutz Kunzmann

Universidade Regional do Cariri (URCA), St. Cel. Antônio Luíz 1161, Museu de Paleontologia Plácido Cidade Nuvens, Crato, Ceará, 63105-010, Brazil

Domingas Maria da Conceição

Departamento de Geologia, Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Campus do Pici – 912, Fortaleza, Ceará, 60440-554, Brazil

Daniel Rodrigues do Nascimento Jr. & Wellington Ferreira da Silva Filho

Structural and Functional Plant Diversity Group, Dahlem Centre of Plant Sciences, Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Altensteinstrasse 6, 14195, Berlin, Germany

Julien B. Bachelier & Clément Coiffard

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

W.V.G., C.C. and J.B.B. made the design and scope of the research; W.V.G. and C.C. conducted phylogenetic analyses; W.V.G. and C.C. took the photos and with J.B.B., designed the figures; W.V.G. prepared the plates; W.V.G. and D.M.C. wrote the section on peduncle anatomy and designed the corresponding figures; T.B.S. wrote the section on plant–insect interactions; D.R.N.J. and W.F.S.F. reviewed the geology; W.V.G., C.C., J.B.B., L.K. and R.I. wrote and reviewed the manuscript.

Correspondence to William Vieira Gobo or Lutz Kunzmann.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

Gobo, W.V., Kunzmann, L., Iannuzzi, R. et al. A new remarkable Early Cretaceous nelumbonaceous fossil bridges the gap between herbaceous aquatic and woody protealeans. Sci Rep 13, 8978 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33356-z

Download citation

Received: 15 November 2022

Accepted: 12 April 2023

Published: 02 June 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33356-z

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.